Today's GrokIt:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality
http://www.infoworld.com/t/net-neutrality/what-the-fccs-net-neutrality-proposal-really-means-242610
http://fox43.com/2014/05/16/fcc-says-fast-lanes-are-a-go-what-net-neutrality-means-for-you/
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27437762
http://www.cnet.com/news/google-glass-explorer-program-finally-opens-to-public/
http://www.wired.com/2014/05/google-self-driving-car-maps/
http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/teenager-types-lightning-speed-smashes-guinness-world-record-fastest-texter-fleksy/#!NXeE4
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/15/technology/personaltech/how-young-is-too-young-for-a-digital-presence.html?ref=technology&_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/video/technology/personaltech/100000002879066/baby8217s-first-tweet.html
Leave a comment!
dmac
6 comments:
if they start having limits on the internet, im going to invite the FCC chairman into a 1v1 and spawn trap him
What kind of parent puts the image of their child on the internet when their not even able to use it themselves. That's gonna put more freaks online.
RIP bruins :o :'( #habssuck #nicosmells #jaayburd #wedontwanthecup
Having a fast lane on the internet sounds to me to be against everything that the internet stands for: Digital Freedom! Having the broadband providers decide who is going to get the fast internet sounds almost monopolistic.
Creating a digital presence for your baby is insane. Maybe making sure your kid has the important foundation skills, like reading and writing, to survive is much more important.
dmac
The internet shouldn't be limited. Parents should limit kids from seeing something they don't want them to see. 10 year olds have Iphones, and have internet access at the palm of their hand, that is the real problem that everybody seems to overlook.
why should the internet be limited ?it should be limited for younger kids than 10 cause maybe it's taking time from their learning and from them not doing their homework or something.
Post a Comment